I fully agree with with above opinion of Jayanta Mukherjee. I believe following clauses of Arms Act cause the problem:We should have a systematic approach to the problem, and firstly try to get the import ban off and then try to approach the courts for changing the notion of the police department that income cannot be the sole criterion for eligibility of licence. Good antecedents alone are the sole criterion. since it entirely depends upon the discretion of the police whether an individual is eligible for licence it is almost certain that the courts would not issue a blanket order regarding easy licencing procedure. So I would suggest that any individual whose licence has been turned down on the ground of income criterion or/ and having already owning a firearm licence should approach the Court first and then if we pull in to get his same I can promise you that we would have a precedent or ratio for the others following.
CHAPTER III - PROVISIONS RELATING TO LICENCES
13. Grant of licences
:
(2) On receipt of an application, the licensing authority, after making such inquiry, if any, as it may consider necessary, shall, subject to the other provisions of this Chapter, by order in writing either grant the licence or refuse to grant the same.
:
14. Refusal of licences
(i) where such licence is required by a person whom the licensing authority has reason to believe---
(1) to be prohibited by this Act or by any other law for the time being in force from acquiring, having in his possession or carrying any arms or ammunition, or
(2) to be of unsound mind, or
(3) to be for any reason unfit for a licence under this Act; or
(ii) where the licensing authority deems it necessary for the security of the public peace or for public safety to refuse to grant such licence.
So the loose clauses/terms in Arms Act that keep the applicants at the mercy of licensing authority to get firearm license:
1)"Inquiry" - Recommendation of inquiry can be anything(time for completion of inquiry is another pain)
2)"Reason to believe" - A loose term, can be any reason based on personal perception of licensing authority.
3)"Any reason" - Another loose term, can be any reason based on personal perception of licensing authority.
4)"Public peace"/"Public safety" - Another loose term/excuse open to be interpreted as per personal perception of licensing authority.
I believe these loose terms "Inquiry", "Reason to believe", "Any reason", "Public peace"/"Public safety" need to go. A person can be a danger to "Public peace"/"Public safety" only when he is insane or is a proclaimed offender(means he is evading the due process of law). Those who are real danger to public peace/safety, are not dependent on licensing authority for getting arms licenses. They have their own ways and means to get much better firearms at a much cheaper cost. Our Hon'ble Home Minister has publicly accepted this fact: http://www.ptinews.com/news/345543_Maoi ... hidambaram
The fight has to be in a systematic, organized way, with lot of supporters in every section and level of society. One idea I can think of is, we can have a particular section in this website, were people facing difficulties in obtaining firearm license and willing to support the cause, can write their problems. After we get large number of people facing difficulty in obtaining license, a PIL is filed in any High Court, to ask government to reconsider the law, to make it very specific, leaving no room for individuals in Licensing Authority to implement Arms Act as per their personal ideas.
Any ideas about legal feasibility and other acceptable ways/means to convince the government to see the reality are welcome.