An Alternate Look at Handgun Stopping Power

A posts related to self defence/ home defence. Please post anything related to legal aspects in the 'Legal Eagle' section.
Post Reply
User avatar
ace
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 3:41 pm

An Alternate Look at Handgun Stopping Power

Post by ace » Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:19 pm

This article regarding 'handgun stopping power' makes an interesting reading: http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7866

For Advertising mail webmaster
sa_ali
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 945
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:50 pm

Re: An Alternate Look at Handgun Stopping Power

Post by sa_ali » Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:26 pm

nice, thanks for sharing.
it just reiterates .22 isnt that bad :D

I like this part in the article

"The average number of rounds until incapacitation was also remarkably similar between calibers. All the common defensive calibers required around 2 rounds on average to incapacitate. Something else to look at here is the question of how fast can the rounds be fired out of each gun. The .38 SPL probably has the slowest rate of fire (long double action revolver trigger pulls and stout recoil in small revolvers) and the fewest rounds fired to get an incapacitation (1.87). Conversely the 9mm can probably be fired fastest of the common calibers and it had the most rounds fired to get an incapacitation (2.45). The .40 (2.36) and the .45 (2.08) split the difference. It is my personal belief that there really isn't much difference between each of these calibers. It is only the fact that some guns can be fired faster than others that causes the perceived difference in stopping power. If a person takes an average of 5 seconds to stop after being hit, the defender who shoots a lighter recoiling gun can get more hits in that time period. It could be that fewer rounds would have stopped the attacker (given enough time) but the ability to fire more quickly resulted in more hits being put onto the attacker. It may not have anything to do with the stopping power of the round."

goodboy_mentor
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 2928
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: An Alternate Look at Handgun Stopping Power

Post by goodboy_mentor » Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:52 pm

The data also reiterates that rifles and shotguns are comparatively better than handguns at producing results.
"If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your State, it probably means that you built your State on my land" - Musa Anter, Kurdish writer, assassinated by the Turkish secret services in 1992

User avatar
xl_target
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3488
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:47 am
Location: USA

Re: An Alternate Look at Handgun Stopping Power

Post by xl_target » Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:13 pm

goodboy_mentor wrote:The data also reiterates that rifles and shotguns are comparatively better than handguns at producing results.
Yup. A long gun is many times more effective than a handgun. If you look at the energy figures for rifles, they make handguns appear positively puny. Rifles/Shotguns are also easier to aim than handguns at slightly longer distances.

Regardless of what caliber or whether you are using a rifle or handgun, if you can't hit your target, it's pretty useless. Close only counts if you are using artillery.
“Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense” — Winston Churchill, Oct 29, 1941

Post Reply