indiaone wrote:LIfe is never perfect. We should try to adjust to the situation and make best use of the same.
Let them enjoy the ownership of guns and BMWs or roam freely with rifles. I do not see any "shocking" in it. After all how does it matter to us or anybody so long the ownership is lawful?varunik wrote:Thats because the arms in our city (Noida) have gobe up.
This due to those housing societies 's buildepayement to farmers are being spent on guns and BMWs.
If you visit Kailsh gn noida , you'll be shoc ked to see the scenario. Peopl roam in freely with rifles insid se the building.
goodboy_mentor wrote:After all how does it matter to us or anybody so long the ownership is lawful?
Why are they in a position to "dominate" other people? Because they are safe to do the mischief, others don't have guns to equalize them.They keep guns just to domunate ppl.
Why the police is not arresting them and law taking its own course?They open fire even in colleges.
I 'm sorry I do not agree to this reasoning. If the policemen are "scared" of guns and ammo then these policemen are not fit to be in the police. On the contrary the police is afraid of the political "connections" of the trouble makers.Even police is scared because of the amount of guns and ammo they carry.
Probably you are not completely informed, there are plenty of ways to overcome this "tracking down" crime thing about licensing. Licensing is not the magic pill for connecting a gun to the crime. To get an idea it is worth reading this thread about gun registry been abolished recently in Canada viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16588 On the other hand the real story behind licensing is that it was created by tyrannical governments so that before doing mass murder, mass confiscation of weapons becomes easy. Name any mass murderer government, mass murder by it was preceded by mass confiscation facilitated by licensing or registration.Most of the guns arent licensed.
This makea difficult for police to track down.
We have plenty of laws to put such irresponsible persons behind bars. What is the police doing?Recently, my classmate was shot at his arm just because he was walking with his gf , a girl which was also eyed by this ***** boy!!
As per Arms Act 1959 arms licenses are issued for self defense, sport and crop protection. Nothing wrong with it. You have already said that the mischief makers have illegal weapons. So it hardly serves the purpose if legal weapons are taken away from the law abiding people. On the contrary it will only make the environment for criminals more safe.Arms should be given only for self defence.
This appears unreasonable. Why law abiding people should give up their rights and not keep firearms? Just because some mischief makers are keeping illegal firearms?If you are someone who likes to keep weapons try airguns.
Those who want to harm you do not harm you after verifying your age. They have no respect for age, whether you are 25 or 52, they do not care.A recent report said that most guns in UP are licensed to ppl below 25.
Do tell me, who's gonna harm you at this age?
As you have already mentioned "these guns" are illegal. We have plenty of laws to take care of these brawls irrespective of the fact whether guns, knives, bombs or whatever are used.These guns end being used in brawls on petty things like a girl or a scratch on a car...
Of course nobody can ever support irresponsible behavior.Keeping guns to attract girls? Or things like this viewtopic.php?f=44&t=1635
I would personally avoid pointing fingers, insinuations or make sweeping comments about any particular community or group in any manner, since all kinds of people from good to bad are to be found everywhere regardless of any kind of social groups. I would request you to please edit your posts to remove such mention.I dont want to pin point some community, but ask any one in Noida/GNoida, ***** communty has created a ruckus over here.
If you read the statistics of National Crime Records Bureau, more than 99% of murders are done using illegal weapons(It clearly shows that criminals do not respect law that is why they are breaking law. And important point to be noted is that most of the victims are disarmed by law to make them defenseless). As you have already mentioned that most of the trouble makers do not own legal arms, it hardly matters to them if licensing is "strict" or reasonable.I am just sayin that licensing shud be more strict.
Ofcourse if u are someone who is a good citizen will get license
A recent report said that most guns in UP are licensed to ppl below 25.
Do tell me, who's gonna harm you at this age?
Those who want to harm you do not harm you after verifying your age. They have no respect for age, whether you are 25 or 52, they do not care.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest