Rifle Catridge Comparison

Here you can post images from your favorite events, places, yourself or your family to share with other site members.
Post Reply
m24
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:57 pm
Location: New Delhi

Rifle Catridge Comparison

Post by m24 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:46 pm

Image

Source: http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2010/0 ... omparison/

Click on the source to see a bigger picture.

Regards
Jeff Cooper advocated four basic rules of gun safety:
1) All guns are always loaded. Even if they are not, treat them as if they are.
2) Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.
3) Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target.
4) Identify your target, and what is behind it.

For Advertising mail webmaster
muthu
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:03 am
Location: TN

Re: Rifle Catridge Comparison

Post by muthu » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:49 pm

Hi m24,
you browsed out
Tremendously outstanding and excellent comparision picture.

Muthu

SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: GOA

Re: Rifle Catridge Comparison

Post by SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE » Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:46 pm

Check the following web link :!:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/recoil_table.htm

:cheers:
SAM
SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE

Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons !

User avatar
Mark
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Middle USA

Re: Rifle Catridge Comparison

Post by Mark » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:36 pm

I don't like tables because the data can be portrayed so out of context that it is pretty irrelevant.

Here is the 3rd paragraph from that page:

It is worth remembering that the majority of authorities agree that recoil of over twenty foot pounds will cause most shooters to develop a serous flinch, which is ruinous to bullet placement (the prime component of killing power). Fifteen foot pounds is probably about the maximum recoil energy most shooters feel reasonably comfortable with, particularly at the shooting range, where most serious marksmanship practice occurs.

Yet, here is another table written by the same gent, but for shotguns:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/shotgun_recoil_table.htm

I've taken the liberty of pasting it here:

Gauge, length (oz. shot@MV) Gun weight (lbs.) Recoil energy (ft. lbs.)
.410 bore, 2.5" (1/2 at 1200) 5.5 7.1
.410 bore, 3" (11/16 at 1135) 5.5 10.5
28 gauge, 2.75" (3/4 at 1200) 6.0 12.8
20 gauge, 2.75" (7/8 at 1200) 6.5 16.1
20 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1220) 6.5 21.0
20 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1175) 6.5 25.0
20 gauge, 3" (1 1/4 at 1185) 6.5 31.0
16 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1220) 7.0 21.5
16 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1240) 7.0 27.6
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1180) 7.5 17.3
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1200) 7.5 23.0
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/4 at 1330) 7.5 32.0
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/2 at 1260) 7.5 45.0
12 gauge, 3" (1 5/8 at 1280) 7.5 52.0
12 gauge, 3" (1 7/8 at 1210) 8.75 54.0
10 gauge, 3.5" (2 1/4 at 1210) 10.5 62.9

As you can see, the 12 gauge starts at 17 ft lbs. My point is that if you can shoot a 12 gauge you should not be afraid to properly shoot any gun, and try to take many of these tables with an awareness of that.
(I'll not go into how fit of the stock and weight of the gun makes a huge difference, as does the shooters hold or position)

-- Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:08 am --

Well shoot, spent a few minutes trying to get the table to look nice and formatted but it doesn't get accepted that way, apologies to all. :D
"What if he had no knife? In that case he would not be a good bushman so there is no need to consider the possibility." H.A. Lindsay, 1947

Post Reply